[members-discuss] New Charging Scheme

On 1/16/19 2:16 PM, TrustHost wrote:
> Hi.
>  
> I think it would be great if the payment depends on the quantity the resources for one account. It would help to return unused IPv4 in free pool for new business. The companies, who really use big networks won't notice such changes. But who received
> the resources before 2012 and has unused /19 and maybe more will think if they really need such big blocks.
>  
> For example we can implement the next charging scheme.
> If one account has more than /20 (not equivalent 4x/22 or the blocks were allocated before 2012) the next /22 ownership will cost some price (e.g. 1400 euro).
>  
> For example:
> There is /17 IPv4 block for one LIR account.
> /17 = 32x/22.
> The total price for this account is (32-4)*1400 = 39 200 euro.
>  
> I think the members must have equal rights, regardless of the year of the membership started.
>  

I do not agree. As a company that has to keep at least 10 /22 available at all times, this means that I would be paying more, just because I need to make sure the company can grow fast enough, when it needs to.

Buying and transferring IPs takes weeks with all the paperwork, so the only way we can keep growing is by keeping IPs in reserve. And we and our clients would need to pay for that.



-- 
Marian Marinov
Founder & CEO of 1H Ltd.
Jabber/GTalk: hackman at jabber.org
ICQ: 7556201
IRC: hackman @ irc.freenode.net
Mobile: +359 886 660 270

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20190117/9bd24f48/attachment.sig>