[members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Together pal
info at together-pal.com
Thu Jan 17 08:02:18 CET 2019
Hello I think its good idea, and it will better if the charge is more as the account has more addresses, exactly like income tax, this is fair and I think it will make available address for accounts like me. Thanks On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:54 AM <ripe-lr at cidr.eu> wrote: > > That does not have anything to do with equal rights. All LIRs already have > equal rights even if they use multiple LIR accounts. > > We already had that scheme and it was removed for good reason. RIPE NCC > does not sell internet number resources and the effort for checking > requests for IPv4 has gone due the one IPv4 /22 per LIR policy change. A > change in favour of IPv4 is useless too, because IPv4 allocations are > already done with the exception of allocations made from the old stock pool. > > We should not try to get back space the next one hundred years, especially > not by using such methods, otherwise that will never end. > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* TrustHost <trusthostt at yandex.ru > <http:///email/new/1/trusthostt%40yandex.ru>> > *Sent:* Wednesday, 16. Jan 2019 – 14:16 CET +0100 > *To:* members-discuss at ripe.net > <http:///email/new/1/members-discuss%40ripe.net> > > *Subject:* [members-discuss] New Charging Scheme > > Hi. > > I think it would be great if the payment depends on the quantity the > resources for one account. It would help to return unused IPv4 in free pool > for new business. The companies, who really use big networks won't notice > such changes. But who received the resources before 2012 and has unused /19 > and maybe more will think if they really need such big blocks. > > For example we can implement the next charging scheme. > If one account has more than /20 (not equivalent 4x/22 or the blocks were > allocated before 2012) the next /22 ownership will cost some price (e.g. > 1400 euro). > > For example: > There is /17 IPv4 block for one LIR account. > /17 = 32x/22. > The total price for this account is (32-4)*1400 = 39 200 euro. > > I think the members must have equal rights, regardless of the year of the > membership started. > > ------------------ > Kind regards, > Boris Loginov > > TrustHost LLC > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss > Unsubscribe: > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/info%40together-pal.com > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20190117/7e54cc37/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] New Charging Scheme
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]