[members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On

Hi,

On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 10:42:15PM +0300, Andrejs Guba wrote:
> So i repeat. It will be interesting to listen to someone who can describe
> his logic in proposed scheme B.

I didn't propose it, but I like scheme B.

Why?  Because it creates incentives to return unused ASNs, unused
PI assignment (or sell them off), etc - instead of just having them
lie around, unused.  If you *need* something, 50 EUR is ok, but "just
to have it", it might be annoying enough to give it back.

(I returned one of my ASNs when they did still cost money, back before
we changed the charging scheme last time - exactly because)

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20190417/d8131793/attachment.sig>