This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bunea TELECOM
suport at bunea.eu
Wed Apr 17 22:10:40 CEST 2019
> Why? Because it creates incentives to return unused ASNs, unused > PI assignment (or sell them off), etc - instead of just having them > lie around, unused. If you *need* something, 50 EUR is ok, but "just > to have it", it might be annoying enough to give it back. No because it will charge the same for a /16 as for a /24. And it’s not fair that after you pay 4k euros for a /24 to pay 50 euros more yearly, unlike some older LIRs that paid next to nothing for a /20 let’s say. If we keep option B we might as well divide the LIRs into two separate types: pre-exaustion (have to pay the 50 euros) post-exaution (exempt from paying the 50 euros) Thanks — Petru Bunea / CEO suport at bunea.eu <mailto:suport at bunea.eu> / +40752481282 <tel:+40752481282> Bunea TELECOM / DATACENTER / APP DEVELOPMENT http://www.bunea.eu <http://www.bunea.eu/> / +40745495495 <tel:+40745495495> > On 17 Apr 2019, at 23:06, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 10:42:15PM +0300, Andrejs Guba wrote: >> So i repeat. It will be interesting to listen to someone who can describe >> his logic in proposed scheme B. > > I didn't propose it, but I like scheme B. > > Why? Because it creates incentives to return unused ASNs, unused > PI assignment (or sell them off), etc - instead of just having them > lie around, unused. If you *need* something, 50 EUR is ok, but "just > to have it", it might be annoying enough to give it back. > > (I returned one of my ASNs when they did still cost money, back before > we changed the charging scheme last time - exactly because) > > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster > -- > have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? > > SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann > D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) > Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://mailman.ripe.net/ > Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/suport%40bunea.eu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20190417/bfb4e05e/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: email-signature.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 2092 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20190417/bfb4e05e/attachment.jpg>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]