This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andrejs Guba
lir at private.lv
Wed Apr 17 21:42:15 CEST 2019
Hello, It will be interesting to hear those who proposed Scheme B. I mean those who was mentioned in the letter : "In response to requests from members" Otherwise it looks to me like manipulation. Look: Everything was quiet. Majority got used to the current charging scheme. Now Scheme B is proposed .. with the word "Volume" Off course many members will be against this change and with clear logic propose scheme based on quantity of ip addresses , not the number of resources. There will be hype .. and after that "good pill" will be proposed. "Good pill" means charges based on quantity and many people will be happy with that. But wait. What problem is solved ? Why we need to change anything? So i repeat. It will be interesting to listen to someone who can describe his logic in proposed scheme B. I myself will vote for scheme A. Thanks! Andrejs
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]