This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hansen, Christoffer
christoffer at netravnen.de
Wed Apr 17 20:53:20 CEST 2019
On 17/04/2019 19:04, Alexandru Doszlop wrote: > All new lirs that receive smaller than /22 assignments will pay more than than > the big isp. Definitely creates a skewed model. If /22 and e.g. /16 gets charged € 50, regardless of the size. But only count as € 50 per '1 resource assignment' > Where is the volume here? ... Not really anywhere (objectively looking). -- Christoffer -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 228 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20190417/35f95dba/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Regarding RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2020 - Two Options to Vote On
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]