[members-discuss] LIR’s billing issues with RIPE NCC, need support

On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 12:49:47AM +0300, Juri wrote:
> Hello Erik,
> 
> I am just talking about clear and understandable billing, nothing more.
> If RIPE NCC want to charge for 3 years - let them charge for 3 years.
> if you they want to charge for 2 years - let them charge for 2.
> 
> But I am strongly against when RIPE NCC each month decide something new
> and change billing way to unpredictable one. And RIPE NCC changes this
> billing issues upto them with out any discussion with LIRs.
> 
> You are not facing with this and thinking in other way. I face with that
> lot of time and have a lot of feedback from other LIRs. And I just want
> billing ways will be predictable, described and clear for all RIPE NCC
> members.
 
That is not does in the way thay you say
Each policy is done after policy proposal, discussions in mailing list or workgroups, voting on RIPE meetings.
This is not about RIPE decision, it is about LIR's decision based on the majority of votes.

Basic old rule (a lot time before the last /8 was reached) is that if you need more space, you need to prove that your old space is used and that you really need more space for your LIR, not for reselling. And it didn't basically change for years.
IP space is not the subject of buyung|selling.

-- 
VOKS LTD


> And I am talking right to make RIPE NCC services better for LIRs.
> 
> 
> Juri.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> members-discuss mailing list
> members-discuss at ripe.net
> https://mailman.ripe.net/
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ripe%40voks.ua