This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Executive Board Resolution on Legacy Internet Resource Holders
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Executive Board Resolution on Legacy Internet Resource Holders
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Executive Board Resolution on Legacy Internet Resource Holders
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at netability.ie
Tue Sep 27 15:10:39 CEST 2016
Hank Nussbacher wrote: > Legacy IP space loses its "status: legacy" if the owner of the address > space sells it. > If RIR policies don't currently hold for legacy IP space, once sold, > that magic status disappears and RIR policies start taking affect. > Why? Because it is the right thing to do. :-) Right, so what you're saying is that the RIPE NCC should have the authority to strip legacy address blocks of their legacy status, even if the legacy holders object to this. They probably won't do this without a policy proposal. So the next step here would be for you to get consensus on a new policy proposal in APWG defining the terms where RIPE policies should apply to legacy address blocks, and in what circumstances the RIPE NCC can forcibly override the rights of legacy space holders. When you get this through APWG, then you'll need to convince the RIPE NCC board to implement it. Please let me know if you intend to do this because if you do, I'd like to invest in popcorn stocks. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Executive Board Resolution on Legacy Internet Resource Holders
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Executive Board Resolution on Legacy Internet Resource Holders
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]