This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Executive Board Resolution on Legacy Internet Resource Holders
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Executive Board Resolution on Legacy Internet Resource Holders
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Executive Board Resolution on Legacy Internet Resource Holders
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at efes.iucc.ac.il
Tue Sep 27 14:27:23 CEST 2016
On 27/09/2016 14:23, Nick Hilliard wrote: > Hank Nussbacher wrote: >> I agree with you. If a legacy owner sells all or part of their legacy >> IP space, that IP space should lose its legacy status. > Why? And how? How could e.g. a RIPE or other RIR policy be used to > implement this when by admission of all, RIR policies do not apply to > legacy space? > > Nick > Legacy IP space loses its "status: legacy" if the owner of the address space sells it. If RIR policies don't currently hold for legacy IP space, once sold, that magic status disappears and RIR policies start taking affect. Why? Because it is the right thing to do. :-) -Hank
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Executive Board Resolution on Legacy Internet Resource Holders
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Executive Board Resolution on Legacy Internet Resource Holders
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]