This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Executive Board Resolution on Legacy Internet Resource Holders
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Executive Board Resolution on Legacy Internet Resource Holders
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Executive Board Resolution on Legacy Internet Resource Holders
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thomas Mangin
thomas.mangin at exa-networks.co.uk
Tue Sep 27 16:20:46 CEST 2016
Hello, > They probably won't do this without a policy proposal. Sounds like a very rational thinking :-) > So the next step > here would be for you to get consensus on a new policy proposal in > APWG > defining the terms where RIPE policies should apply to legacy address > blocks, and in what circumstances the RIPE NCC can forcibly override > the > rights of legacy space holders. When you get this through APWG, then > you'll need to convince the RIPE NCC board to implement it. As we are at it, please make sure the policy includes how it can be legally enforced. The policy should include a section covering legal risks as … I would hate to see: - a RIPE NCC member suing the organisation as the IP space he has is used else and can not be used - a legacy IP space holder suing the RIPE NCC for have sold their ‘property’ Good luck ! Sincerely. Thomas
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Executive Board Resolution on Legacy Internet Resource Holders
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Executive Board Resolution on Legacy Internet Resource Holders
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]