[members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model

I agree entirely! Too many people are blaming others for their own short
sightedness, and frankly it's no one's fault but their own.

On 22 Sep 2016 10:16 p.m., "Gert Doering" <gert at space.net> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 06:30:54PM +0000, Network Engineers wrote:
> > We need to see better hardware support for IPv6 before we work on
> end-user adoption.  It???s hard to build apps at Internet scale when your
> expensive front-end load balancers don???t support IPv6 in their ASICs.
>
> Decide with your wallet.  Just do not buy the stuff that cannot do IPv6 -
> there is enough stuff available today (and has been since many years)
> that will happily do IPv6 at the same speed as IPv4.
>
> For loadbalancers, at least F5 and Citrix Netscaler never had this
> "IPv6 in software only" tax.
>
> (And do not complain *now* that you did not listen to us telling everyone
> for the last 10+ years that "if you buy new gear, make sure that it will
> do proper IPv6 when you decide to turn it on, when you're ready")
>
> Gert Doering
>         -- NetMaster
> --
> have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
>
> SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
> D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
> Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20160922/bbd9fc29/attachment.html>