[members-discuss] Input from Membership on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model

Hi,

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 06:30:54PM +0000, Network Engineers wrote:
> We need to see better hardware support for IPv6 before we work on end-user adoption.  It???s hard to build apps at Internet scale when your expensive front-end load balancers don???t support IPv6 in their ASICs.

Decide with your wallet.  Just do not buy the stuff that cannot do IPv6 - 
there is enough stuff available today (and has been since many years)
that will happily do IPv6 at the same speed as IPv4.

For loadbalancers, at least F5 and Citrix Netscaler never had this
"IPv6 in software only" tax.

(And do not complain *now* that you did not listen to us telling everyone
for the last 10+ years that "if you buy new gear, make sure that it will
do proper IPv6 when you decide to turn it on, when you're ready")

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20160922/047a683a/attachment.sig>