[members-discuss] [Ticket#2012072401002498] Probably Free /8 networks in RIPE region

Hi,

On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 03:11:45AM +0400, LeaderTelecom Ltd. wrote:
> Here is some examples why current charging scheme and new draft is not so good
> for Members and why we have to move to charging scheme based on count of used
> IPs. 
> 
> Case 1. Inetnum: 15.0.0.0/8 (16 777 216 IPs ). ASSIGNED PI. Hewlett-Packard
> Company.

This was not handed out by the RIPE NCC, so is completely irrelevant for
any discussions about the RIPE NCC charging scheme.

(And it's not covered by RIPE address policies either)

> Case 2. Inetnum: 53.0.0.0/8 (16 777 216 IPs ). ASSIGNED PI. Daimler AG.

This was not handed out by the RIPE NCC, so is completely irrelevant for
any discussions about the RIPE NCC charging scheme.

(And it's not covered by RIPE address policies either)

> Case 3. Inetnum: 51.0.0.0/8 (16 777 216 IPs ). EARLY-REGISTRATION. UK

This was not handed out by the RIPE NCC, so is completely irrelevant for
any discussions about the RIPE NCC charging scheme.

(And it's not covered by RIPE address policies either)

> Case 4. Inetnum:151.3.0.0 - 151.84.255.255 ( 5 373 952 IPs).
> EARLY-REGISTRATION. WIND Telecomunicazioni S.p.A. 
>    a) For free (legacy).

This was not handed out by the RIPE NCC, so is completely irrelevant for
any discussions about the RIPE NCC charging scheme.

(And it's not covered by RIPE address policies either)

(Are you starting to see a pattern?)

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279