[members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Jul 25 22:21:11 CEST 2012
Hi, On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 02:51:36PM +0200, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote: > PI for IPv4 has the same limitation: Actually, it hasn't, there's the exception for transit networks - which is used for lots of interesting things. This is completely off-topic on members-discuss, though - if you want to discuss the assignment rules for IPv4 or IPv6 PI space, please be my guest on the address-policy mailing list. (OTOH, *charging* for PI objects is decided by the membership, even though the address-policy WG expressed the recommendation to make it so) Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]