This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Jul 25 22:21:11 CEST 2012
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 02:51:36PM +0200, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
> PI for IPv4 has the same limitation:
Actually, it hasn't, there's the exception for transit networks - which
is used for lots of interesting things.
This is completely off-topic on members-discuss, though - if you want
to discuss the assignment rules for IPv4 or IPv6 PI space, please be
my guest on the address-policy mailing list.
(OTOH, *charging* for PI objects is decided by the membership, even
though the address-policy WG expressed the recommendation to make it so)
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]