[members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sebastian Wiesinger
sebastian at noris.net
Wed Jul 25 14:51:36 CEST 2012
* Max Tulyev <president at ukraine.su> [2012-07-25 14:42]: > 25.07.12 15:35, Sebastian Wiesinger написав(ла): > > exactly what do you need to qualify for IPv6 PI? The last time I > > looked[1] there was no requirements except the contractual ones to get > > a /48. > > Hostmasters rejects requests where some of IPv6 address space is for > interconnecting third parties (i.e. interface IPs, colo, LAN with > customers, etc), while for IPv4 PI it is possible and used widely. Hello, PI for IPv4 has the same limitation: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-528#8 "In contrast, Provider Independent (PI) address space is assigned to End Users directly from the address pools managed directly by the RIPE NCC. PI space cannot be re-assigned or further assigned to other parties." So it violates the rules either way, v4 or v6. Regards Sebastian -- noris network AG - Thomas-Mann-Straße 16-20 - D-90471 Nürnberg Tel +49-911-9352-0 - Fax +49-911-9352-100 http://www.noris.de - The IT-Outsourcing Company Vorstand: Ingo Kraupa (Vorsitzender), Joachim Astel, Hansjochen Klenk - Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Stefan Schnabel - AG Nürnberg HRB 17689
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]