This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sebastian Wiesinger
sebastian at noris.net
Wed Jul 25 14:51:36 CEST 2012
* Max Tulyev <president at ukraine.su> [2012-07-25 14:42]: > 25.07.12 15:35, Sebastian Wiesinger написав(ла): > > exactly what do you need to qualify for IPv6 PI? The last time I > > looked[1] there was no requirements except the contractual ones to get > > a /48. > > Hostmasters rejects requests where some of IPv6 address space is for > interconnecting third parties (i.e. interface IPs, colo, LAN with > customers, etc), while for IPv4 PI it is possible and used widely. Hello, PI for IPv4 has the same limitation: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-528#8 "In contrast, Provider Independent (PI) address space is assigned to End Users directly from the address pools managed directly by the RIPE NCC. PI space cannot be re-assigned or further assigned to other parties." So it violates the rules either way, v4 or v6. Regards Sebastian -- noris network AG - Thomas-Mann-Straße 16-20 - D-90471 Nürnberg Tel +49-911-9352-0 - Fax +49-911-9352-100 http://www.noris.de - The IT-Outsourcing Company Vorstand: Ingo Kraupa (Vorsitzender), Joachim Astel, Hansjochen Klenk - Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Stefan Schnabel - AG Nürnberg HRB 17689
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]