This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tomas Hlavacek
tomas.hlavacek at ignum.cz
Wed Jul 25 12:22:48 CEST 2012
Hi! On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Paolo Di Francesco < paolo.difrancesco at level7.it> wrote: > > 2) the bigger is the LIR, i.e. the more revenues it gets in the telco > market, the more it should pay. This is not so related to "resources > consumption" but to a more logic and ethical issue regarding the duties > that each of us should have in front of the community. I do not see why > a small company or a start up should pay as much as a Telco whose > revenues are billions per year. If we state that "we pay all the same" > then we are not talking of a community, we are going against the basic > idea of a community where each one should contribute for what you have. > It is communism or socialism or whatever... Anyway I do not agree that somebody is better than I am (or my company is) to pay less than I have to pay for the same services to the regional monopoly. (Please note that I work for an organization which has the RIPE NCC contribution category Small.) Tomas -- S pozdravem, Tomáš Hlaváček ------------------------------------------------- IGNUM s.r.o. | Vinohradská 190 | Praha 3 | 130 61 Tel: +420 296 332 211 | Fax: +420 296 332 222 Tel: +420 604 111 111 | Mobil: +420 603 111 111 Web: http://www.ignum.cz | http://www.domena.cz -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20120725/d913e570/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]