This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Paolo Di Francesco
paolo.difrancesco at level7.it
Wed Jul 25 12:42:14 CEST 2012
Hi Tomas > Hi! > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Paolo Di Francesco > <paolo.difrancesco at level7.it <mailto:paolo.difrancesco at level7.it>> wrote: > > > 2) the bigger is the LIR, i.e. the more revenues it gets in the telco > market, the more it should pay. This is not so related to "resources > consumption" but to a more logic and ethical issue regarding the duties > that each of us should have in front of the community. I do not see why > a small company or a start up should pay as much as a Telco whose > revenues are billions per year. If we state that "we pay all the same" > then we are not talking of a community, we are going against the basic > idea of a community where each one should contribute for what you have. > > > It is communism or socialism or whatever... you forgot to mention Christian :) > Anyway I do not agree that > somebody is better than I am (or my company is) to pay less than I have > to pay for the same services to the regional monopoly. > in term of "service" I do not agree that it's the same service. A small LIR does not continously request different address spaces (which now takes time to be approved by RIPE) or the number of objects allocated into the DB. > (Please note that I work for an organization which has the RIPE NCC > contribution category Small.) > Put in simple words: the lower is the fee for small and extra small the more benefits we will get as Europeans. Paying the same fee as a national operator is paying, does not sound like a good idea to me for the creation of new ideas and to keep the market as much open as we can to innovation. By the way, I would say that sounds more communist the fact that the price should be the same for each LIR. Now talking as Capitalist: the bigger is your company the more interest you have in order to keep the service up and running. Now considering that the fees are used to make RIPE survive I would say: ok let's close RIPE and let's see who is going to cray more because there is no more IPv4/IPv6 management in Europe: a small LIR or a huge Telco? That's why a bigger LIR should contribute MORE than a small one. As I said, just my 2 Euro cents > Tomas > > -- > S pozdravem, > Tomáš Hlaváček > ------------------------------------------------- > IGNUM s.r.o. | Vinohradská 190 | Praha 3 | 130 61 > Tel: +420 296 332 211 | Fax: +420 296 332 222 > Tel: +420 604 111 111 | Mobil: +420 603 111 111 > Web: http://www.ignum.cz | http://www.domena.cz > > > > ---- > If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss > mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: > https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/view > > Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses. > -- Ing. Paolo Di Francesco Level7 s.r.l. unipersonale Sede operativa: Largo Montalto, 5 - 90144 Palermo C.F. e P.IVA 05940050825 Fax : +39-091-8772072 assistenza: (+39) 091-8776432 web: http://www.level7.it
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme discussion
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]