This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Clarification re proposed Charging Scheme 2012
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Clarification re proposed Charging Scheme 2012
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Clarification re proposed Charging Scheme 2012
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Wed Oct 12 19:52:28 CEST 2011
On 12/10/2011 18:48, Sascha Luck wrote: > Hi Jochem, > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 07:35:38PM +0200, Jochem de Ruig wrote: >> For example, if a /18 is requested and would put an LIR into a larger >> category, if we did not take the PI resource into account for the >> categorisation, requesting a /18 of PI space would be beneficial over a >> requesting a /18 of PA space. > Right, this makes kind of sense for PI space assigned to the requesting > LIR. What about space requested on behalf of end users - the LIR does > not benefit from the use of this space, in fact after 2007-01 it merely > handles the request on behalf of the end user and the NCC. > The LIR is free to charge the end user for this service, surely? Or am I confused? Nigel ---- If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/view Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses.
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Clarification re proposed Charging Scheme 2012
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Clarification re proposed Charging Scheme 2012
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]