This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Clarification re proposed Charging Scheme 2012
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Clarification re proposed Charging Scheme 2012
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Clarification re proposed Charging Scheme 2012
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Wed Oct 12 19:48:29 CEST 2011
Hi Jochem, On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 07:35:38PM +0200, Jochem de Ruig wrote: >For example, if a /18 is requested and would put an LIR into a larger >category, if we did not take the PI resource into account for the >categorisation, requesting a /18 of PI space would be beneficial over a >requesting a /18 of PA space. Right, this makes kind of sense for PI space assigned to the requesting LIR. What about space requested on behalf of end users - the LIR does not benefit from the use of this space, in fact after 2007-01 it merely handles the request on behalf of the end user and the NCC. Regards, Sascha Luck ---- If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/view Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses.
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Clarification re proposed Charging Scheme 2012
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Clarification re proposed Charging Scheme 2012
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]