[members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010

Salut,

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 04:44:07PM +0100, Martin List-Petersen wrote:
> Any agreement in any case would be until further notice. As there was no
> contract and thus no way of telling how long you'd have the ressources.
> Matter of fact is, that nobody owns the number-ressources.
> 
> If it was a matter of ownership, sure, but it's not. It's a service. At
> any given time, you'll have the number-ressources on borrowed time and
> can be happy if you have them free for as long as you had them free.
> 
> But there has at no time been the case of ownership. And with a service,
> that can change, be there a written contract or not. It just has to be
> announced in due time and that has been done.

The question in times of customary trademark claims and everything is more
like, would a LIR bet the existence of their company (potentially) on the
likelyhood that any given judge agrees with the RIPEs vision of their
services and their obligation to provide them.

But hey, legal uncertainty is modern, so I see RIPE seems to be doing well.

Kind regards,

				Tonnerre
-- 
SyGroup GmbH
Tonnerre Lombard

Solutions Systematiques
Tel:+41 61 333 80 33		Güterstrasse 86
Fax:+41 61 383 14 67		4053 Basel
Web:www.sygroup.ch		tonnerre.lombard at sygroup.ch
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20090619/11abdcfb/attachment.sig>