[members-discuss] Charging scheme draft again

Hello!

On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:39:19AM +0200, Tonnerre Lombard wrote:

> Salut,
> 
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:05:21AM +0300, Dmitry Kiselev wrote:
> >   Could anybody point me to discussion archive or any sorce,
> > except charging-scheme-2010.pdf, where discussed my question:
> > "Why PA allocation size and year of allocation takes into
> > account while LIR's score calculation and, in the same time,
> > PI assignment size and year of assignment does not?"
> 
> Because those ressources don't belong to the LIR and are already
> billed separately I'd think.


No, it is not that I mean. My question about "why PI assignment
size and year of assignment doesn't take into account while
DA fee calculation"? Scenarios B1, B2 and C does not do that.
And in the same time scenarios B1, B2 and C use this criterias
for LIR's score/fee calculation.  Why? Why DA better/worse than
LIR's PA? According to B1,B2 and C.


-- 
Dmitry Kiselev