[members-discuss] Charging scheme draft again
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme draft again
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme draft again
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dmitry Kiselev
dmitry at volia.net
Tue Jul 21 11:07:17 CEST 2009
Hello! On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:39:19AM +0200, Tonnerre Lombard wrote: > Salut, > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:05:21AM +0300, Dmitry Kiselev wrote: > > Could anybody point me to discussion archive or any sorce, > > except charging-scheme-2010.pdf, where discussed my question: > > "Why PA allocation size and year of allocation takes into > > account while LIR's score calculation and, in the same time, > > PI assignment size and year of assignment does not?" > > Because those ressources don't belong to the LIR and are already > billed separately I'd think. No, it is not that I mean. My question about "why PI assignment size and year of assignment doesn't take into account while DA fee calculation"? Scenarios B1, B2 and C does not do that. And in the same time scenarios B1, B2 and C use this criterias for LIR's score/fee calculation. Why? Why DA better/worse than LIR's PA? According to B1,B2 and C. -- Dmitry Kiselev
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme draft again
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme draft again
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]