This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Charging scheme draft again
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme draft again
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Wouter De Clercq is afwezig.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bernard Dugas
bernard.dugas.2009 at is-production.com
Tue Jul 21 11:58:16 CEST 2009
Dmitry Kiselev wrote: > No, it is not that I mean. My question about "why PI assignment > size and year of assignment doesn't take into account while > DA fee calculation"? Scenarios B1, B2 and C does not do that. > And in the same time scenarios B1, B2 and C use this criterias > for LIR's score/fee calculation. Why? Why DA better/worse than > LIR's PA? According to B1,B2 and C. I support this question and would like to understand also. Best regards, -- __Bernard DUGAS ______________________________________________________ | IS Production s.a. Innovative Solutions | | Technoparc Pays de Gex bernard.dugas.2009 at is-production.com | | 01633 ST GENIS POUILLY CEDEX - FRANCE - Mob.: +33 615 333 770 | | PLEASE NOTE NEW EMAIL ! ATTENTION NOUVEL EMAIL ! | |______________________________________________________________________|
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme draft again
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Wouter De Clercq is afwezig.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]