[members-discuss] Charging scheme draft again
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme draft again
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Wouter De Clercq is afwezig.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bernard Dugas
bernard.dugas.2009 at is-production.com
Tue Jul 21 11:58:16 CEST 2009
Dmitry Kiselev wrote: > No, it is not that I mean. My question about "why PI assignment > size and year of assignment doesn't take into account while > DA fee calculation"? Scenarios B1, B2 and C does not do that. > And in the same time scenarios B1, B2 and C use this criterias > for LIR's score/fee calculation. Why? Why DA better/worse than > LIR's PA? According to B1,B2 and C. I support this question and would like to understand also. Best regards, -- __Bernard DUGAS ______________________________________________________ | IS Production s.a. Innovative Solutions | | Technoparc Pays de Gex bernard.dugas.2009 at is-production.com | | 01633 ST GENIS POUILLY CEDEX - FRANCE - Mob.: +33 615 333 770 | | PLEASE NOTE NEW EMAIL ! ATTENTION NOUVEL EMAIL ! | |______________________________________________________________________|
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme draft again
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Wouter De Clercq is afwezig.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]