This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Charging scheme draft again
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme draft again
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme draft again
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tonnerre Lombard
tonnerre.lombard at sygroup.ch
Tue Jul 21 10:39:19 CEST 2009
Salut, On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:05:21AM +0300, Dmitry Kiselev wrote: > Could anybody point me to discussion archive or any sorce, > except charging-scheme-2010.pdf, where discussed my question: > "Why PA allocation size and year of allocation takes into > account while LIR's score calculation and, in the same time, > PI assignment size and year of assignment does not?" Because those ressources don't belong to the LIR and are already billed separately I'd think. Kind regards, Tonnerre -- SyGroup GmbH Tonnerre Lombard Solutions Systematiques Tel:+41 61 333 80 33 Güterstrasse 86 Fax:+41 61 383 14 67 4053 Basel Web:www.sygroup.ch tonnerre.lombard at sygroup.ch -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20090721/3abf846e/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme draft again
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme draft again
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]