This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Sander Steffann sander at steffann.nl
Sat Oct 5 20:15:45 CEST 2019

Hi,

> Op 5 okt. 2019, om 19:27 heeft Michel Py <michel at arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us> het volgende geschreven:
> 
>> ripe at jack.fr.eu.org wrote :
>> What is not FUD is that 240/4 is not currently routable through my home router
> 
> Oh wow, you need 240/4 on your home router ? must be a pretty big home, if you don't have enough with 10/8

I must say I have had enough of your snarky remarks. They are very unproductive and do not contribute to this working group in any way. Please refrain from posting unless you have something to contribute please.

Cheers,
Sander

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20191005/3ce1c4a0/attachment.sig>

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]