This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

ripe at jack.fr.eu.org ripe at jack.fr.eu.org
Sat Oct 5 19:50:29 CEST 2019

Well, if someone has to use to to provide some kind of service, someone
shall have the possibility to use this service

If you are doing a network for yourself, you can use whatever range from 0/0


On 10/05/2019 07:27 PM, Michel Py wrote:
>> ripe at jack.fr.eu.org wrote :
>> What is not FUD is that 240/4 is not currently routable through my home router
> 
> Oh wow, you need 240/4 on your home router ? must be a pretty big home, if you don't have enough with 10/8
> 
> Michel.
> 

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]