This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Michel Py michel at arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us
Sat Oct 5 20:31:25 CEST 2019

> Sander Steffann wrote :
> I must say I have had enough of your snarky remarks. They are very
> unproductive and do not contribute to this working group in any way. Please
> refrain from posting unless you have something to contribute please.

Then unsubscribe me. What is very unproductive is the last twenty years you have failed to make IPv6 the prevalent protocol. That's half one's career, and you will spend the other half failing again.
Great job. An entire career failing. Employers like people who achieve goals. Good luck.

Michel.

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]