This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg] Report from ITU Study Group 20 meeting 3-13 December 2018 in Wuxi, China
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Report from ITU Study Group 20 meeting 3-13 December 2018 in Wuxi, China
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Report from ITU Study Group 20 meeting 3-13 December 2018 in Wuxi, China
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at foobar.org
Fri Dec 14 12:41:19 CET 2018
Jim Reid wrote on 14/12/2018 10:58: >> On 14 Dec 2018, at 07:23, de Brün, Markus >> <markus.debruen at bsi.bund.de> wrote: >> >> As I understood, there will be a new version of the draft. > > That depends on the original author. He has not updated > Y.IPv6RefModel, the ITU draft document, for two years and so far has > not taken account of *any* of the feedback from the WG. I will be > very surprised if that situation changes. Addressing the comments > from the WG would pretty much mean throwing away the current draft > and starting all over again from scratch. More to the point, the work on Y.IPv6RefModel should stop because the subject matter is out of scope for the ITU. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Report from ITU Study Group 20 meeting 3-13 December 2018 in Wuxi, China
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Report from ITU Study Group 20 meeting 3-13 December 2018 in Wuxi, China
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]