This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[ipv6-wg] Report from ITU Study Group 20 meeting 3-13 December 2018 in Wuxi, China

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Report from ITU Study Group 20 meeting 3-13 December 2018 in Wuxi, China
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Report from ITU Study Group 20 meeting 3-13 December 2018 in Wuxi, China

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jim Reid jim at rfc1035.com
Fri Dec 14 12:58:28 CET 2018

> On 14 Dec 2018, at 11:41, Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org> wrote:
> 
> More to the point, the work on Y.IPv6RefModel should stop because the subject matter is out of scope for the ITU.

That point was made in Wuxi but it fell on deaf ears, just like it did at previous meetings.

I fear the only way Y.IPv6RefModel will die at SG20 is when the author admits it's dead.

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Report from ITU Study Group 20 meeting 3-13 December 2018 in Wuxi, China
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Report from ITU Study Group 20 meeting 3-13 December 2018 in Wuxi, China

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]