This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] Report from ITU Study Group 20 meeting 3-13 December 2018 in Wuxi, China
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Report from ITU Study Group 20 meeting 3-13 December 2018 in Wuxi, China
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Report from ITU Study Group 20 meeting 3-13 December 2018 in Wuxi, China
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Fri Dec 14 12:06:39 CET 2018
> On 14 Dec 2018, at 10:58, Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com> wrote: > > SG20 did not accept the proposals from RIPE NCC, ARIN and the US government -- backed by UK, Germany and Canada -- that work on Y.IPv6RefModel should stop. But they came very close to doing that. It was a meta-discussion on proceduals matters that detailed things, not the content of the "kill Y.IPv6RefModel" proposals. Ugh! That last sentence should have been: > It was a meta-discussion on procedural matters that derailed things, not the content of the "kill Y.IPv6RefModel" proposals. I'm sure you all realised that anyway.
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Report from ITU Study Group 20 meeting 3-13 December 2018 in Wuxi, China
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Report from ITU Study Group 20 meeting 3-13 December 2018 in Wuxi, China
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]