This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/

[ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Mikael Abrahamsson swmike at swm.pp.se
Wed Apr 5 17:20:12 CEST 2017

On Wed, 5 Apr 2017, Claudio Ferronato wrote:

> (get interface traffic via SNMP, for example) and ethernet VLAN to seperate 
> customers L2 traffic could not be a viable solution, maybe because CPE needs 
> manual configuration to set VID.

Why would the CPE need to send tagged frames? The access switch can do the 
tagging/detagging, the CPE can send untagged frames.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]