This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Claudio Ferronato
claudio.ferronato at hynet.it
Wed Apr 5 17:15:28 CEST 2017
Il 05/04/2017 13:26, Jan Zorz - Go6 ha scritto: > Operators who offered ADSL built a PPPoE provisioning and all the > billing infrastructure behind and even if doing PPPoE on FTTH does not > make *any* technical sense, I heard that re-doing and changing the whole > provisioning system would cost them too much, so they went the easy way > - PPPoE over anything/everything. It is what it is and I guess we'll > have to live with it ;) Having a PPPoE interface to every customer also simplify network monitoring (get interface traffic via SNMP, for example) and ethernet VLAN to seperate customers L2 traffic could not be a viable solution, maybe because CPE needs manual configuration to set VID. So, even new operators can find PPPoE better than DHCP or IPoE. Regards Claudio
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]