This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/

[ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Claudio Ferronato claudio.ferronato at hynet.it
Wed Apr 5 18:14:45 CEST 2017

Il 05/04/2017 17:20, Mikael Abrahamsson ha scritto:
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2017, Claudio Ferronato wrote:
>
>> (get interface traffic via SNMP, for example) and ethernet VLAN to
>> seperate customers L2 traffic could not be a viable solution, maybe
>> because CPE needs manual configuration to set VID.
>
> Why would the CPE need to send tagged frames? The access switch can do
> the tagging/detagging, the CPE can send untagged frames.
>

Because I'm talking from a WISP perspective, where there isn't a "real" 
access switch.

Claudio

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]