[ipv6-wg] RFC 1918 in "production networks" (was IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings)

Hi,

On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 04:20:55PM -0800, Leo Vegoda wrote:
> > But seriously, we will be living in this ugly world not long from now,
> > whether we like it or not. Why not try it out before it will be forced
> > on us?
> 
> I agree with this statement. I think there is real value in
> experiencing the kinds of problems we are likely to see when the
> IPv4 address space has been fully allocated and further network
> growth cannot use unique IPv4 addresses. Having an optional CGN-style
> network to see what works and what needs to be improved would be
> genuinely useful.

At the beginning of this thread, it was stated that the RIPE meeting
network is not to be treated as an experiment or testbed.

If people think there is an interest in having a NAT-broken network
around, then please make it available on a dedicated SSID, but don't
experiment with the meeting network.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  144438

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 306 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20100203/11856bbe/attachment.sig>