This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[ipv6-wg] RFC 1918 in "production networks" (was IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings)

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RFC 1918 in "production networks" (was IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings)
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RFC 1918 in "production networks" (was IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings)

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Leo Vegoda leo.vegoda at icann.org
Wed Feb 3 01:20:55 CET 2010

On Feb 2, 2010, at 3:43 PM, David Kessens wrote:

[…]

> But seriously, we will be living in this ugly world not long from now,
> whether we like it or not. Why not try it out before it will be forced
> on us?

I agree with this statement. I think there is real value in experiencing the kinds of problems we are likely to see when the IPv4 address space has been fully allocated and further network growth cannot use unique IPv4 addresses. Having an optional CGN-style network to see what works and what needs to be improved would be genuinely useful.

Regards,

Leo Vegoda

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RFC 1918 in "production networks" (was IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings)
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RFC 1918 in "production networks" (was IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings)

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]