[ipv6-wg] RFC 1918 in "production networks" (was IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings)

On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 10:01 +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
> If people think there is an interest in having a NAT-broken network
> around, then please make it available on a dedicated SSID, but don't
> experiment with the meeting network.

Long version:

After having read this thread, this one paragraph by Geert makes a lot
of sense.

Points made in this thread were, in the order my client presented them
to me: 
  1) Do not experiment with the RIPE meeting network
  2) Do not push single-stack IPv6 down people's throat
  3) Do push bleeding IPv4 down people's throat
  4) Testing out what the rest of the world shortly will experience is
useful
  
Given 1), it makes a lot of sense to put 2) + 3) on a separate SSID.
Give it a well-descriptive name and that's it... Problem solved!
Attendees can do testing on their *own* terms, which is bound to make
them happier.

Short version:

I second this statement.

:)

Regards,
-- 
Martin Millnert <millnert at csbnet.se>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20100203/2e56e2f8/attachment.sig>