This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg] IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andy Davidson
andy at nosignal.org
Tue Feb 2 15:31:57 CET 2010
On 02/02/2010 14:18, James Aldridge wrote: > Reading the minutes of the IPv6 WG at RIPE 59 I read: >> David asked the audience if the IPv6 Hour should be rerun at future >> meetings.. There is consensus that it should be. > Rob Blokzijl has asked that we treat the RIPE Meeting network as a > production network. This effectively means that we won't be turning off > the dual-stack network for another "IPv6 Hour". [...] > Any feedback would be appreciated. Thank you. A good position, James. There is a difference between advocacy and forcing v6 down peoples' throats. Proving the dual-stack model works is important enough. Maybe we can force dual stack down people's throats by forcing a registration portal that was only available via v6, once complete you had access to the production dual stack network ? ;-) Andy
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]