This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg] IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marc Blanchet
marc.blanchet at viagenie.ca
Tue Feb 2 15:31:58 CET 2010
James Aldridge a écrit : > Reading the minutes of the IPv6 WG at RIPE 59 I read: >> David asked the audience if the IPv6 Hour should be rerun at future >> meetings.. There is consensus that it should be. > > Rob Blokzijl has asked that we treat the RIPE Meeting network as a > production network. This effectively means that we won't be turning off > the dual-stack network for another "IPv6 Hour". > > What we can do is to build the IPv6 only networks as we did in Berlin > and make these available to anyone who wants to use them, but without > the complications caused by the IPv6 Hour. > > One question that remains is whether, with rfc2766 now "historic", > providing NAT-PT on the IPv6-only networks is worthwhile for RIPE 60 and > future meetings. Would it be enough just to provide the IPv6 networks > but without any translation to be able to reach the IPv4 legacy Internet? we have an implementation of nat64 that we will be running in a well-known internet engineering conference in the next weeks for that reason. We could bring it to RIPE if you like. Marc. > > Any feedback would be appreciated. > > Regards, > James >
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]