This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/

[ipv6-wg] IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jan Zorz @ go6.si jan at go6.si
Tue Feb 2 15:28:19 CET 2010

James Aldridge wrote:
> One question that remains is whether, with rfc2766 now "historic", 
> providing NAT-PT on the IPv6-only networks is worthwhile for RIPE 60 and 
> future meetings.  Would it be enough just to provide the IPv6 networks 
> but without any translation to be able to reach the IPv4 legacy Internet?

Is there any NAT64/DNS64 mechanism out there in running-code yet? I hear Cisco 
will deploy this in some experimental IOS later this year. I suspect this also 
to be crap like NAT-PT, but we never know...

/jan

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 experiments at future RIPE Meetings

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]