[enum-wg] Discuss: draft-hoeneisen-enum-validation-epp-01

Bernie, Alexander,

I'm really interested how similar/different are Switch and ENUM.AT
(draft-mayrhofer-enum-validation-01) solutions...

Could you guys enumerate the major differences and similarities between
your implementations (Internet-Drafts)?

Andrzej

On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Bernie Hoeneisen wrote:

> Hi!
>
> As some of you know, in the IETF, there is some work on-going concerning
> ENUM and validation of E.164 numbers. At the IETF-62 in Minneapolis.
> the draft referred below has been approved as a Working Group item of the
> IETF ENUM WG:
>
> Abstract
>
>     This document describes an EPP extension framework for mapping
>     information about the validation process that has been applied for
>     the E.164 number (or number range), which the ENUM domain name is
>     based on.  Specified in XML, this mapping extends the EPP domain name
>     mapping to provide an additional feature required for the
>     provisioning of ENUM domain names.
>
>
> URLs
>
>    * http://ietf.hoeneisen.ch/draft-hoeneisen-enum-validation-epp-01.txt
>    * http://ietf.hoeneisen.ch/draft-hoeneisen-enum-validation-epp-01.html
>
>
> In Switzerland we are running an EPP Server including this extension for
> the ENUM Tier-1 Registry. So far we did not run into any trouble.
>
> I am about to write an update of this draft. So far I have not received
> any feedback. Does this mean, that everything in there is just fine or
> that people are not interested / have not read it at all? ;-)
>
> Besides the technical and other feedback, I'd be interested:
> - Who is planning to use this EPP extension for ENUM?
> - Who cannot use this extensions and what are the reasons?
>
> Looking forward for lots of comments!
>
>
> cheers,
>   Bernie Hoeneisen, Switch, Project Manager ENUM
>