[dnssec-key-tf] agreements on the use of the repository

I have Richard (Rick) Lamb, who setup that ns.iana.org service signed  
to talk at the EOF (having seen his presentation at IETF, and then  
reminded again by andrei)
My question to him and IANA, apart from expressing the appreciation  
for the work done, is whether his bosses will allow this to continue  
to be available.

Joao

On 17 Sep 2007, at 14:20, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:

> On 13.09 03:41, Sam Weiler wrote:
>>
>> I think we would be well served to not fret too much about the  
>> distant
>> future (e.g. "when IANA is ready") and instead focus on "what do we
>> want today".
>
> I am currently sitting 5 feet from David Conrad and had a short chat
> with him about this area.  He ipointed me to a URL of an provisional
> demonstration service that to me looks very much like what we are
> discussing here.
>
> https://ns.iana.org/dnssec/status.html
>
>> ...
>> But if that's our only path forward, we risk having IANA drop the
>> ball, which doesn't serve the community.  I think we're best served
>> by, in parallel, asking IANA to run a TAR and setting one up at the
>> NCC.
>
> So to me it looks like our discussion is being overtaken by events
> which are a Good Thing(TM). But maybe I am missing something
> that is somehow deficient in the service IANA provides.
>
> Note well: many things we build on today started as provisional
> demonstrations and some have not moved from this stage in 20  
> years ;-).
>
>> Would it be most productive for this task force to focus on the
>> NCC-run option for the moment?
>
> Only if what IANA is doing is deficient. We can of course have RIPE
> say something like "Should IANA discontinue the service before the  
> root is signed
> we want the RIPE NCC to take it over asap.?"
>
> Of course we should provide input to the IANA on how to improve the  
> service
> if we have significant input.
>
> Daniel
>