This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] revised text for NTIA response - v4
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] revised text for NTIA response - v4
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] revised text for NTIA response - v4
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Patrik Fältström
paf at cisco.com
Mon Nov 3 20:11:18 CET 2008
On 3 nov 2008, at 18.05, bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote: > I think a more pragmatic reply (if the previous points are to > be respected) would be something along these lines: > > 10. The organization that generates the root zone file must sign the > file and therefore must hold the private part of the zone signing key. > > or > > 10. The organization that generates the root zone file must have > unfettered > access to the zone signing key components. > > > I have a slight inclination towards the second. I think the first of these is better as the word "unfettered" is not easy to understand if one is not english speaking. I for one have no idea what it means... The simpler the text, the better. Patrik
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] revised text for NTIA response - v4
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] revised text for NTIA response - v4
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]