[dns-wg] revised text for NTIA response - v4

On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 11:56:16PM +0000, Jim Reid wrote:
> On Nov 3, 2008, at 16:22, bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> 
> By all means Bill express that as your view when you respond to the  
> NTIA consultation. However please don't open up that can of worms  
> here. 

	just providing a bit of backing material on some of the
	unstated assumptions in the RIEP WG response. I have no intention
	to debate the relative merits over email.  (But if I can have 
	a quiet chat over there in the bar w/ you...)


> >	anyway, point 10 woudl be clearer if the reason fo rthe must was
> >	made explicit.
> 
> Noted. Can we agree to leave the matter there? I'll add some  
> explanatory text for the next version.

	i think that will help make the point. (as a native english 
	speaker :)

--bill