[dns-wg] revised text for NTIA response - v4

On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 09:11:18PM +0200, Patrik FC$ltstrC6m wrote:
> 
> On 3 nov 2008, at 18.05, bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> 
> >	I think a more pragmatic reply (if the previous points are to
> >	be respected) would be something along these lines:
> >
> >10. The organization that generates the root zone file must sign the
> >file and therefore must hold the private part of the zone signing key.
> >
> >or
> >
> >10. The organization that generates the root zone file must have  
> >unfettered
> >access to the zone signing key components.
> >
> >
> >	I have a slight inclination towards the second.
> 
> I think the first of these is better as the word "unfettered" is not  
> easy to understand if one is not english speaking. I for one have no  
> idea what it means...
> 
> The simpler the text, the better.
> 
>    Patrik



Main Entry:
    fetB7ter 
Pronunciation:
    \Kfe-tIr\ 
Function:
    noun 
Etymology:
    Middle English feter, from Old English; akin to Old English fE
t foot
Date:
    before 12th century

1 : a chain or shackle for the feet 
2 : something that confines : restraint


	that clarified, if you are happier with the first choice, i think
	it will make the response a better one than the current text.


--bill