This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[diversity] *draft* CoC Team doc
- Previous message (by thread): [diversity] *draft* CoC Team doc
- Next message (by thread): [diversity] *draft* CoC Team doc
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Amanda Gowland
agowland at ripe.net
Mon Sep 2 14:09:38 CEST 2019
Hi Daniel, On 02/09/2019 14:03, Daniel Karrenberg wrote: > > I consider this absolutely not ready for a consensus call. It > introduces a new process with grave sanctions including > > * > > “Removing a presentation and video archive from the meeting website” > Disagree. If someone violates the CoC in their presentation, they should be given an opportunity to remove the offending material and re-upload. Likewise, if there's a video recording of someone being racist/sexist/homophobic/harrasing (for example), the video should either be removed or have the offending content edited out. > > * > > “Requiring that the violator leave the meeting/social immediately > without a refund (as per the RIPE Meeting Terms and Conditions)” > This is nothing new. We already state this in the T&Cs for the RIPE Meeting that all attendees agree to in the registration process. > > * > > “Banning attendance for future meetings (in the case of repeated > violations, violence and extreme violations)” > > Yet there is no mention at all of appeal, review or redress. This is > not the way the RIPE community should operate. > This was discussed on Friday with HPH - I'll be adding some text in here re: Appeal...as well as incorporating the rest of his feedback. > > I also suggest to have the language reviewed by the NCC legal team for > legality and precision > before considering a consensus call. > Yes, have already discussed this and that is the plan. > > Daniel > Thanks, Amanda > > On 30 Aug 2019, at 13:13, Amanda Gowland wrote: > > Thanks Hans Petter, > > Let me work the final few comments into the draft, and then I'll > poke some of the others to make sure they're happy for us to do that. > > Amanda > > On 30/08/2019 11:07, Hans Petter Holen wrote: > > b) We can ask HPH to declare consensus + open the call for > volunteers > > > Let me know when you are ready for me to do the last call for > consensus on the RIPE list. > > Maybe you also want a time-slot in the Community Plenary on > Thursday. > > Hans Petter > > _______________________________________________ > diversity mailing list > diversity at ripe.net > https://mailman.ripe.net/ > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/diversity/attachments/20190902/3138d543/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [diversity] *draft* CoC Team doc
- Next message (by thread): [diversity] *draft* CoC Team doc
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]