[diversity] *draft* CoC Team doc

I consider this absolutely not ready for a consensus call. It introduces 
a new process with grave sanctions including

    + “Removing a presentation and video archive from the meeting 
website”

    + “Requiring that the violator leave the meeting/social 
immediately without a refund (as per the RIPE Meeting Terms and 
Conditions)”

    + “Banning attendance for future meetings (in the case of repeated 
violations, violence and extreme violations)”

Yet there is no mention at all of appeal, review or redress. This is not 
the way the RIPE community should operate.

I also suggest to have the language reviewed by the NCC legal team for 
legality and precision
before considering a consensus call.

Daniel




On 30 Aug 2019, at 13:13, Amanda Gowland wrote:

> Thanks Hans Petter,
>
> Let me work the final few comments into the draft, and then I'll poke 
> some of the others to make sure they're happy for us to do that.
>
> Amanda
>
> On 30/08/2019 11:07, Hans Petter Holen wrote:
>>
>>
>>     b) We can ask HPH to declare consensus + open the call for 
>> volunteers
>>
>>
>> Let me know when you are ready for me to do the last call for 
>> consensus on the RIPE list.
>>
>> Maybe you also want a time-slot in the Community Plenary on Thursday.
>>
>> Hans Petter
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> diversity mailing list
> diversity at ripe.net
> https://mailman.ripe.net/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/diversity/attachments/20190902/7f8ac334/attachment.html>