This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[diversity] Code of Conduct
- Previous message (by thread): [diversity] Code of Conduct
- Next message (by thread): [diversity] Code of Conduct
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck [ml]
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Tue Oct 22 12:47:30 CEST 2019
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 12:20:30AM +0200, Job Snijders wrote: >The above is a false dichotomy wrapped in an ad hominem spiced up with a >straw men argument. To me it seems you went out of your way to antagonize >and provoke. Why? Not for the fun of it. I'm trying to tease out whether that CoC is merely flawed and overshooting its stated aim (protecting meeting attendants from harassment and assault) or intentionally designed to be abusive (cleansing the policymaking community of those annoying wrongthinkers and reactionaries). rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [diversity] Code of Conduct
- Next message (by thread): [diversity] Code of Conduct
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]