[diversity] Requesting Impact Analysis + Legal Review from the RIPE NCC on CoC 2.0

Hi,

As Daniel already indicated: we (the community) might need a more formal
process for agreeing on procedures and documents that are not policy.
Rob calls them "parallel activity" below. Hans Petter referred to them
as "Community Governance" at some point.

So no, I don't think anyone is expecting to apply the full PDP to the
code of conduct, but since we don't have another clear process right
now, maybe we can borrow some aspects from the PDP for now (such as the
impact analysis).

I am not sure we really need to ask Hans Petter to ask the RIPE NCC to
do an impact analysis. I think the task force can do that directly. But
maybe I misunderstood and all the task force wants to get is clarity
about the process from Hans Petter - which is probably something we'll
have to develop as a community, but I assume Hans Petter has some ideas
about it.

Cheers,
Mirjam


On 04/10/2019 11:19, Rob Evans wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>> What do other people think?
> 
> I’m not really surprised.  Other non-policy documents have gone through the largely the same procedure.  I suppose a heads-up would have been useful, but this could just be a mismatch of expectations — those in the NCC expect us to be using the PDP, we thought this was a parallel activity.
> 
> When the only hammer you have is the PDP, every document looks like a policy. :-)
> 
> I suspect getting consensus on v3 and getting the IA on that is the most likely way forward, in my limited understanding anyway.
> 
> Cheers,
> Rob
> 
> _______________________________________________
> diversity mailing list
> diversity at ripe.net
> https://mailman.ripe.net/
>