This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[db-wg] abuse-c: proposal

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Niall O'Reilly niall.oreilly at ucd.ie
Fri Feb 6 14:02:42 CET 2004

On 6 Feb 2004, at 12:45, MarcoH wrote:

> Sounds good, but what do you consider 'primary objects', as in what
> templates will be modified to allow for abuse-mailbox and/or abuse-c ?

Sorry, I should have made this clearer.

I'm thinking of inet*num, aut-num as 'primary'; person, role, mntner
as 'indirect'.  This would involve extending 6 templates for 
'abuse-mailbox'
and 3 templates for 'abuse-c'.  Ppl may think of others.

Niall

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]