[db-wg] abuse-c: proposal

On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 01:02:42PM +0000, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
> 
> On 6 Feb 2004, at 12:45, MarcoH wrote:
> 
> >Sounds good, but what do you consider 'primary objects', as in what
> >templates will be modified to allow for abuse-mailbox and/or abuse-c ?
> 
> Sorry, I should have made this clearer.
> 
> I'm thinking of inet*num, aut-num as 'primary'; person, role, mntner
> as 'indirect'.  This would involve extending 6 templates for 
> 'abuse-mailbox'
> and 3 templates for 'abuse-c'.  Ppl may think of others.

To get this clear you mean this ?

inetnum		abuse-c	abuse-mailbox
inet6num	abuse-c	abuse-mailbox
aut-num		abuse-c abuse-mailbox

mntner		abuse-mailbox
person		abuse-mailbox
role		abuse-mailbox

Looks fine to me...the best of both worlds, although we might consider to
also extend irt with the abuse-mailbox and allow abuse-c to refer to an
irt object ? But maybe I'm opening another can of worms here.

Grtx,