[db-wg] abuse-c: proposal

On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 12:32:42PM +0000, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
> It's been very quiet on the list since the frantic activity
> at the end of last week.  I expect day-to-day reality has
> imposed itself.
> 
> I've done some further thinking, and have reviewed the contributions
> last week on the db-wg list.  I've tried to recognize the issues and
> alternatives in this message and to make proposals as straw-men for
> consensus.
> 
> I've used a bullet-point approach, as I think no-one is likely to
> have time to read anything more discursive.  I'll happily explain
> anything that people find too terse.

Sounds good, but what do you consider 'primary objects', as in what
templates will be modified to allow for abuse-mailbox and/or abuse-c ?

Grtx,

MarcoH